Thread: if ubuntu is not ugly
year year 1 of crowd tells regularly, ubuntu in fact linux distributions ugly.
there standard responses expression;
"you can change it"
"you can install bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla pretty"
"it's not ugly it"
"you're 1 doesn't default appearance"
"you're troll"
"i'm closing thread"
in fact, programming skills reducing creation , developer's brain unable sense beauty @ all.
of programmers, of programmers produces software maybe functional, simple or usefull definetely "very ugly"
google developers surprised me google chrome comes in 1 "simple, easy, neat, speedy, functional" in same time.
, there simple proof shows "linux not ugly, ubuntu pretty" people fact,
ubuntu ugly;
http://www.gnome-look.org/index.php?...7f5cfe19809986
why downloaded themes macos , vista themes if ubuntu not ugly?
maybe fact can trigger unsensable brains see how ubuntu ugly is.
i wonder how many one-post cowardly trolls appear on daily basis?
Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Community Discussions Ubuntu, Linux and OS Chat Recurring Discussions if ubuntu is not ugly
Ubuntu
Comments
Post a Comment